It seems that there are certain people who are gifted with certain attributes that lead to their ultimate career success. Maybe it’s hard wired into them. Or, maybe they were born into families that understand the system of making money, or achieving great things. Or maybe it’s just another of those success secrets that has to be discovered by each individuals.
Whatever the “secret” may be, Earl Nightingale, one of America’s many authorities on achievement, who composed a great number of success pieces that he aired on radio for many years believed that success was achieved through rigid adherence to goals led to ultimate success. And, this philosophy has held sway for some time.
Nightingale also believed that some people, for that matter very few, who did become financially successful without the employment of rigid adherence to goals, just happened to swim into the right river. They became successful by swimming with the current of that river. He called these people River People. And their ultimate success was a little more than a fortunate accident.
It has been my experience that the “secret of success” lies somewhere between the two poles of goal-centeredness and stepping into the right river. For that matter, it is more likely that a person will become successful by finding their river than by setting goals. And the measure of success is not always a measure of possessions.
We know that success is not just about money. As Professor Tom Morris tells us, in his book, True Success, that:
“The happiest people in the world are people who love what they are doing, regardless of whether wealth, fame, power, and elevated social status ever come their way.”
It is becoming increasingly obvious to most of us that the best laid plans often go awry in a rapidly changing economy. So, it may just be that those people who boast and brag about their fabulous, methodical goal achievement may just have fallen into a stream that leads him to the accomplishment of his goals.
The simple facts of the matter are that those who are willing to make great personal sacrifices to accomplish their goals usually gather to themselves those people and circumstances that support their aims.
I heard somewhere a few years ago that the “average” successful business person tried and failed at 16 businesses before he found the one that was just right. It may just be that a willingness to fail and fail often, combined with the ability to fail quickly and move on, is exactly what success is made of.
Before we go much further I would like to share with you what Nightingale had to say about “river people,” those who find the right stream to swim in.
“If you're going to be a success as a human being, you have to fit into one of two groups, or belong to both of them.
The first group belongs to what I call "the river." These are men and women who have found, often early in life, although not always, a great river of interest into which they throw themselves with exuberance and abandon. They are quite happy to spend their lives working and playing in that river.
For some, the river may be a particular branch of science; for others, one of the arts. There are some physicians, for example, who are so wrapped up in medicine that they hate to leave; even after a 16 hour day, they can't wait to get back to it.
These people are happiest and most alive when they're in their river — in whatever business or career or profession it happens to be. And success comes to such people as inevitable as a sunrise. In fact, they are successes the moment they find their great field of interest; the worldly trappings of success will always come in time. Such people don't have to ask, "What will I do with my life?" Earl Nightingale
Where I differ from Mr. Nightingale is that while many “river people” as he called them may find their river of interests, it is not their interest in a subject or field that engages and captivates people for many years. Quite the contrary, interests change over time. Most people lose interest quickly or find new interests as they mature and age.
The waning of interests over time does not apply to strengths. Strengths grow over time. A strength, because it is somehow wrapped up in a person’s mental, physical, and psychological makeup grows because it is intrinsically a part of them. A strength is so integrated within a person’s character that, once he or she discovers their strengths, and takes ownership of them, they become their calling card, their unique selling proposition, their “brand.” And, strengths denied or left undiscovered don’t die, but remain as urges or callings throughout an individual’s life.
Once a person discovers and identifies with her own strengths she operates in her field(s) of endeavor as the strengths guide her to do so. If wise and attuned with her strengths, she learns to avoid working in areas that are her weaknesses and delegates her weaknesses to those who have strengths in those areas.
To further disagree with Nightingale, I would go so far as to say that one’s strengths direct their interests and anywhere that she knows her strengths can manifest themselves in a contribution, she will have an interest.
Strengths are not the same as personality types. But there appears to be a strong correlation.
Unfortunately,
“Fortune favors the one who can early in life divine what they are good at. ... people, even in their forties and fifties, may have talents which even they are not aware of...” Charles Handy The Age of Unreason
I believe that Handy was talking about strengths more than talents here. His work also shows that, choice based upon understanding of oneself is the most powerful choice one can make.
The greatest challenge facing us all is to discover our strengths while we are involved in all the busy activities that challenge us each day.
If you are like most people, you have chose your career when you chosen your field of study. Let’s take business, for example. More men and women have been entering college on a business career path than any other, turning their back on the sciences. Among those who know they should go to college in order to succeed, many try to “find themselves” by going to college to get some sort of diploma. They often choose liberal studies in lieu of any career path that will lock them into a specific field. It has been said more than a few times that someone who is taking liberal arts courses is wasting their time because there are no jobs for liberal arts majors. This may or may not be true.
Suppose those who do not take enter college on a career path to high paying jobs, but to gain a “liberal education” graduate with a broader understanding of a complex world. Suppose they are able to see patterns in human behavior or have discovered fields of interests that match their strengths. Could they have made a better choice than those who chose a field at age 18 and are now working in fields they hate?
These questions are not merely rhetorical. Many recent studies show that less than 20 of all college graduates – only a few years after graduation – are working in the field in which they received their degrees. Perhaps a liberal arts degree could be more helpful in the job market in future years. Many employers are beginning to believe that as well as they now see the value of a broad, versus a narrow educational background as an asset in the changing world of work.
It may just be that it is better to get a broader feel for one’s talents and interests, for one’s strengths early on and not be confronted with the middle age question, “What should I do when I grow up?”
Perhaps job hopping is the same as river jumping, not aimless as some may think but part of a purposeful search for meaningful work.